Further Proof Hillary Knew All About Harvey Weinstein’s Sexual Abuse of Women

Besides the fact that EVERYONE in Hollywood knew all about Harvey Weinstein abusing women for DECADES, there’s further proof that Hillary Clinton was also aware of her close pal’s perversion, rapes, and abuse of women.
Hillary and Bill Clinton’s closest Hollywood friend and confidant, Linda Bloodworth Thomason, claims she not only knew all about Weinstein, she tried to stop him from hosting political functions because of it.
From Young Cons
As more and more women have come forward, A-listers who are normally intrepid, social injustice sniffers have scrambled to condemn Weinstein and announce that they had no idea all this was going on. Some said this despite knowing him for decades, starring in his films and being friends with accusers who starred in his films. OK. Whatever. I, myself, was a member of a “Let’s Bring Harvey Weinstein Down” lunch club, and I don’t even work in features.
And yet there appears to be no record of Thomasen actually going on record against Weinstein. And no one did bring him down until now. So what exactly was that club doing?
Check what she says about her dear friend the other abuser.
However, I will be the first to admit that clearly delineated moral choices can still be painfully complex where friendship is involved. One of the best friends I will ever have and a man I love dearly, former President Bill Clinton, has certainly taxed my feminist conscience, but always without diminishing my affection. I even helped write his apology to the nation for his own sexual misconduct, was sitting next to him when he delivered it, and believe to this day it was based on something that was none of our business.
None of our business that he assaulted women? That he allegedly raped Juanita Broaddrick? Some liberals like Thomasen still like to cling to this fiction that people were just talking about consensual, albeit inappropriate and extramarital, sex. As opposed to the actual harassment and assault that was alleged. So she gives her buddy Bill a pass.
But here’s the money paragraph.
And yes, some may call it hypocritical, but I confess to having had no problem warning at least three top-level Democratic operatives against allowing Harvey Weinstein to host political fundraisers. A warning that evidently (and to the glee of Fox News) fell on deaf ears.
She told them and they knew.
They took his money anyway.
And are people to believe that she told the three Democratic operatives but didn’t warn her best friends in the world the Clintons when Harvey threw Hillary a 53rd birthday party fundraiser? Or at any of the other fundraisers that he threw for her?
If she knew about Weinstein, Hillary knew.
She then tries to minimize the knowing, even as she had just called it out and chastised it.
Anyway, instead of re-litigating how we all got here, we might now be better served to ask not whether we knew about Weinstein’s crimes, but rather why we didn’t make it our business to know —particularly we women who have even a modicum of power or financial success. Shouldn’t it be our job to ask the females around us — the secretaries, the personal assistants and makeup artists — “Are you being treated OK? Is anyone harassing you? If this is happening, I promise I’ll stand right beside you.” Wouldn’t that be a sweet world?
Some of the women did talk, just as the women who allegedly were assaulted by Bill Clinton did talk. But they were put down, just as the women who were Bill’s victims were, by Hillary and others on the Clinton team.
Democrats knew, just as they knew about Bill Clinton. They just didn’t care.
Share on Google Plus

0 comentarios:

Publicar un comentario