Tim Kaine Claims Vegas Shooter Stopped ‘Because He Didn’t Have a Silencer’

Democrats should probably not tweet or talk about guns, since they are 100% clueless and have no knowledge or understanding of guns or the culture that surrounds them.
Tim Kaine is now able to get into the MIND of the Vegas shooter, apparently.
Kaine believes that the shooter only stopped shooting because he didn’t have a “silencer” on his weapon.
Kaine then goes on to “wonder” how much worse the shooting would have been if he had a “silencer” on his semi-automatic weapon.
Right, except there’s no such thing as “silencers” except maybe in the movies.
It’s called a suppressor, and it does not “silence” the sound of the bullets, and it wouldn’t have made much of a difference in the Vegas shooting.
In reality, Kaine and his fellow Democrats are using this horrible tragedy to try and defeat a measure by pro-Second Amendment groups to legalize the use of suppressors for recreational target and sport shooting.
These people are elected officials, and they’re literally spreading 100% FAKE NEWS.
From Breitbart
Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA) claims the attacker who opened fire on Las Vegas concert goers was only stopped “because he didn’t have a silencer on his weapon.”
According to the Washington Post, Kaine asked, “Can you imagine what this would have been if he had silencers on those weapons?”
His use of the word “silencer” is an echo of other leftists like Rosanne Cash and Gabby Giffords, both of whom use the word “silencer” to describe suppressors. “Silencer” is misleading insomuch as it gives the impression that suppressors silence firearms in real life the way they do in movies. But they do not. Rather, they simply muffle the initial, ear-piercing sound wave created when the bullet is fired.
Kaine’s former running mate, Hillary Clinton, made a similar claim about suppressors on October 2. She tweeted:
Share on Google Plus

0 comentarios:

Publicar un comentario